Intubation difficulties: definition and significance
Intubation difficulties arise when the insertion of the endotracheal tube into the trachea is complicated, for example by anatomical variations.
Difficulties with intubation
In anaesthesiology, intubation difficulties refer to a condition in which the insertion of an endotracheal tube into the trachea is difficult or cannot be achieved at the first attempt. Causes range from anatomical variations to disorders of the neck or the airways.
Table of Contents
Important note
This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for a medical diagnosis or advice. If you are unsure, or if you require a personalised treatment plan, it is essential that you consult a qualified specialist.
Intubation difficulties are not uncommon. According to clinical reviews, the incidence of unexpected intubation difficulties ranges from 0.1 % to 10.1 % of all anaesthetic procedures. It is worth noting that, according to published studies, around 93 % of these cases cannot be predicted in advance. Even in well-planned procedures, there therefore remains a residual risk — a factor that is relevant from both a medical and a financial perspective.
Medical definition
Difficulties with intubation describe endotracheal intubation that is difficult or does not succeed immediately. This refers to the insertion of a breathing tube (endotracheal tube) into the trachea. The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA Task Force) defines a difficult laryngoscopy as the failure to visualise the glottis after several attempts with the head in the optimal position. During general anaesthesia for cosmetic surgery, securing the airway is the top priority.

Cormack and Lehane classification: Severity grades I to IV
Key points at a glance
- Grades I and II: glottis fully or partially visible; intubation is usually unproblematic
- Grade III: Only the epiglottis is visible; aids such as a video laryngoscope are required
- Grade IV: No structures visible; alternative procedures are essential
- A modification based on Samsoon and Young subdivides Grade II into IIa and IIb to provide a finer distinction
Anaesthetists use the Classification according to Cormack and Lehane during laryngoscopy, to assess how clearly the glottis is visible. Grades III and IV are clinically regarded as difficult laryngoscopies. Experience has shown that these cases require a systematic approach following a step-by-step algorithm and the early use of aids.
Classification according to Cormack and Lehane (1984): The higher the grade, the more difficult the intubation. Grades I and II are considered uncomplicated, whilst grades III and IV require specialised techniques and experienced anaesthetists.
| Degree | Visibility of the glottis | Clinical implications |
|---|---|---|
| Grade I | The vocal fold is fully visible | Intubation is possible without any problems |
| Grade II | Posterior parts of the glottis are visible | Possible; BURP manoeuvre if necessary |
| Grade III | Only the epiglottis is visible; the glottis is not visible | Difficult; video laryngoscopy or a guide rod required |
| Grade IV | No laryngeal structures visible | Very difficult: fibre-optic or surgical airway management |
Modification according to Samsoon and Young
The modification proposed by Samsoon and Young supplements the original Cormack-Lehane classification by introducing a subdivision of Grade II. Grade IIa refers to a situation in which the posterior commissure of the glottis is still visible. Grade IIb is present when only the arytenoid cartilage remains visible. This distinction has practical value: clinically, Grade IIb is close to Grade III. It therefore justifies the early use of aids. The BURP manoeuvre – applying manual pressure to the thyroid cartilage (Backward, Upward, Rightward Pressure) – improves visibility in Grade II and III cases. It is considered the first line of treatment before more complex alternative procedures are employed.

Causes and risk factors
Intubation difficulties arise from a combination of anatomical factors, physical characteristics and pre-existing conditions. The RODS mnemonic provides a concise summary of the four most common predictors:
- R — Restricted mouth opening: limited mouth opening (interincisal distance of less than 3 cm)
- O — Obstruction: blockage of the upper airways caused by a tumour, haematoma or abscess
- D — Disrupted or distorted oropharynx: anatomical abnormalities in the throat and mouth
- S — Stiff cervical spine or lungs: restricted mobility of the cervical spine, e.g. due to spondylarthrosis
Risk factors checklist: What you should know before your anaesthesia consultation
- Restricted mouth opening (less than three finger-widths between the incisors)
- A short, thick neck or a significantly elevated body mass index (obesity)
- Reduced mobility of the cervical spine (e.g. osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis)
- Protruding upper incisors or pronounced retrogenia (receding chin)
- A visibly enlarged thyroid gland or a palpable swelling in the neck area
- Known or documented intubation difficulties during previous operations
- Previous operations or radiotherapy in the neck and jaw area
- Chronic respiratory conditions such as asthma, COPD or obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
- Rheumatic conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint or the cervical spine
- Please bring your anaesthesia record from previous procedures (which includes details of airway management)
- List all current medicines and dosages in writing
- Please inform the anaesthetist of any known allergies to general anaesthetics or local anaesthetics
Anatomical and patient-specific risk factors in detail
Obesity increases the incidence of intubation difficulties to around 11 %; in patients of normal weight, this figure is around 7 %. Increased soft tissue in the neck restricts the view of the glottis and makes laryngoscopy more difficult.
The Mallampati score is regarded as another established predictor. In the Mallampati test, the patient opens their mouth wide and sticks out their tongue. The anaesthetist assesses how much of the pharyngeal structure is visible. Scores III and IV — in cases where the palatine tonsils or the posterior pharyngeal wall cannot be visualised — are associated with an increased likelihood of difficult laryngoscopy. Further anatomical risk factors:
- A short, thick neck with reduced mobility
- Receding chin (retrogenia)
- Previous radiotherapy or surgery in the head and neck region
- Pregnancy (changes in mucosal blood flow and anatomy)
- Well-known conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis with atlantoaxial instability
- Patients aged over 55 with degenerative changes in the cervical spine
The 3-3-2 rule supplements the risk assessment using finger measurements: the mouth must be open by at least 3 fingers’ width, there must be a gap of at least 3 fingers’ width between the chin and the hyoid bone, and at least 2 fingers’ width between the hyoid bone and the thyroid cartilage. If these distances fall below the minimum values, laryngoscopy is likely to be difficult.
How is a difficult airway managed?
Key points at a glance
- Prediction and planning are the most important tools — pre-operatively, not intraoperatively
- If a difficult airway is anticipated: perform fibre-optic intubation or video laryngoscopy with a backup plan
- Unexpectedly difficult airway: a structured algorithm involving a maximum of 3–4 intubation attempts, followed by prioritising oxygenation
- „Cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate“ (CICO): an extremely rare situation, requiring surgical airway management
The management of intubation difficulties follows a step-by-step approach in accordance with the guidelines issued by the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). The approach makes a fundamental distinction between anticipated and unexpected airway difficulties.
Anticipated difficult airway: planning before anaesthesia
If pre-operative findings suggest that intubation may be difficult, the anaesthetist plans airway management before induction of anaesthesia. The standard procedure is the Fibre-optic intubation (FOI) whilst the patient is awake. The patient remains conscious throughout and breathes spontaneously. The anaesthetist numbs the mucous membranes with a local anaesthetic and inserts the flexible fibre-optic endoscope through the nose or mouth into the trachea. Only once the tube is securely in place is general anaesthesia administered.
Alternatively, there is the Video laryngoscopy is used. A miniaturised camera on the blade of the laryngoscope displays the glottis on a monitor — without the need for a direct line of sight between the mouth and the larynx. Video laryngoscopes have largely replaced direct laryngoscopy in cases where difficult airways are anticipated. They offer a significantly better view and have a shorter learning curve than the FOI.
Unexpectedly difficult airway: a structured approach
Unexpectedly difficult intubations occur without warning. They put the clinical team under time pressure. The DGAI algorithm sets out the following step-by-step procedure:
- Optimisation of storage Raise the head to a „sniffing position“; if necessary, place a support under the shoulders of obese patients.
- Another attempt using an improved technique BURP manoeuvre, spatula change (e.g. to a straight Miller spatula), guide rod in the tube.
- Video laryngoscopy After two unsuccessful attempts, switch immediately to a video laryngoscope.
- Supraglottic airway device Insertion of a laryngeal mask or a laryngeal tube to maintain airway patency and provide oxygenation for the patient.
- Waking the patient Termination of anaesthesia unless there is an emergency indication. Planning a new procedure with an enhanced setup.
- Surgical airway management Last resort in a CICO situation — cricothyroidotomy or emergency tracheotomy.
Clinical background
Repeated intubation attempts significantly increase the risk. From the third attempt onwards, the likelihood of serious complications such as mucosal oedema, haemorrhage and aspiration rises markedly. For this reason, switching to alternative techniques at an early stage is regarded as an important indicator of quality in anaesthesia.

Pre-operative assessment: How anaesthetists identify risks at an early stage
Pre-operative risk assessment is the most effective tool for preventing unanticipated intubation difficulties. Anaesthetists systematically record all relevant findings during the pre-operative consultation. The following charts show which factors are assessed:
Mouth opening
An interincisal distance of less than 3 cm is considered restricted and makes it difficult for the laryngoscope to gain access.
Mallampati score
Assessment of the structure of the throat with the mouth open — a score of III/IV indicates an increased risk.
Neck circumference and BMI
Obesity and a short neck are independent risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy.
Cervical spine mobility
Limited extension of the cervical spine prevents optimal axial alignment.
Previous operations and radiotherapy
Scar tissue or radiation-induced changes in the head and neck region can reduce soft tissue and joint mobility.
Previous anaesthesia
Documented intubation difficulties from previous anaesthetic procedures are the strongest single predictor.
If the assessment indicates an increased risk, the anaesthetist prepares an extended set of instruments: several laryngoscope blades of various shapes, a video laryngoscope, guide rods, a laryngeal mask and, if necessary, the fibre-optic set. This pre-operative preparation of the „difficult airway trolley“ is standard practice in anaesthesia departments.
Anyone who has experienced intubation difficulties during previous operations should Anaesthesia card be documented. The anaesthesia record is a standardised document that records the degree of difficulty, the Cormack-Lehane score and the equipment used. In accordance with the DGAI’s recommendation, this record is given to the patient so that they can present it at any future procedure.
Implications for cosmetic surgery patients: medical risks and financial consequences
Cosmetic surgery is predominantly carried out under general anaesthesia. This means that, in principle, every patient is exposed to the risk of intubation difficulties — regardless of whether the procedure is liposuction, a nose job or a breast lift. Many patients underestimate both aspects of this risk: the medical and the financial.
Possible medical consequences of intubation difficulties
If intubation difficulties arise, the time taken to establish secure ventilation is prolonged. During this phase, there is a risk of hypoxia, i.e. a lack of oxygen in the blood. Other possible complications arising from repeated intubation attempts include:
- Lesions to the mucous membranes in the throat, larynx or trachea
- Aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs (aspiration pneumonia)
- Laryngospasm — a reflex spasm of the glottis
- Bronchospasm with difficulty breathing
- Damage to teeth or injuries to the lips and oral mucosa
- In exceptional cases: prolonged intensive care follow-up and ventilation
The vast majority of cases result in no lasting damage, as experienced anaesthetists follow a clear protocol. However, even intubation difficulties that are well managed can trigger medically necessary follow-up treatment — and thus incur significant follow-on costs.
Financial implications: Who pays if complications arise following cosmetic surgery?
In the case of elective cosmetic surgery paid for privately, statutory health insurance funds will only cover the costs of medically necessary follow-up treatment under certain conditions. If intubation complications arise following cosmetic surgery, health insurance funds may sometimes demand reimbursement of the costs they have paid.
In practical terms, this means that anyone who is placed on a ventilator in an intensive care unit on an unplanned basis due to intubation complications, or who requires revision surgery, will face significant costs. Insurance covering consequential costs can bridge this financial gap. 4beauty offers insurance cover for medically necessary treatments resulting from the insured procedure — regardless of whether the complication was foreseeable or not.
You can find information on the specific treatments and procedures covered by insurance in the Overview of all covered treatments. Frequently asked questions about the scope of cover are answered in the 4beauty’s FAQ section.
Information for patients
During the pre-operative consultation, be sure to mention any anatomical peculiarities you are aware of — such as a limited range of mouth opening, a short neck or previous anaesthetic complications. Your anaesthetist can then tailor the plan accordingly. Any documented intubation difficulties should be recorded in your anaesthesia record, which you should bring with you to every future procedure.
Frequently asked questions about intubation difficulties
Typical warning signs include a short, thick neck and a restricted mouth opening (less than 3 cm). A Mallampati score of III or IV and obesity also increase the risk. Previous surgery or radiotherapy in the head and neck region, as well as a history of anaesthetic complications, are further warning signs. The anaesthetist systematically assesses these findings — using the Mallampati test and the 3-3-2 rule.
Modern alternatives include video laryngoscopy and fibre-optic intubation (FOI) whilst the patient is awake. Supraglottic airway devices, such as a laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube, are used as a temporary measure. The BURP manoeuvre — applying manual pressure to the thyroid cartilage — improves visibility in Grade II and III cases before more complex procedures become necessary. The choice of procedure depends on the individual findings and the severity of the condition.
In cases where a difficult airway is anticipated, pre-operative findings — Mallampati III/IV, short neck, previous problems — indicate that intubation is likely to be difficult. The anaesthetist prepares by ensuring an extensive range of instruments is available and by having a clear contingency plan in place. An unexpectedly difficult airway occurs without warning. Studies show that it accounts for around 93 % of all difficult intubations. A structured emergency algorithm then comes into play, prioritising the patient’s oxygenation after a maximum of three to four attempts.
Yes. If intubation difficulties lead to medically necessary follow-up measures — such as an unplanned stay in intensive care or revision surgery — statutory and private health insurers often do not cover these costs in full in the case of elective cosmetic procedures. A Aftercare insurance from 4beauty covers medically necessary follow-up treatment following the insured procedure. You can find out more in the FAQs on follow-up cost cover.
Anaesthetists recommend that a anaesthesia card be issued as soon as intubation difficulties have arisen during anaesthesia — regardless of whether these were successfully managed without complications. The card documents the Cormack-Lehane grade, any aids used and any specific anatomical findings. In accordance with the DGAI recommendation, patients should bring this card with them to every future surgical procedure so that the anaesthetist can prepare a tailored setup from the outset.